The Washington Post slams Harry Reid over a comment he made yesterday while announcing that he will not vote for Judge John Roberts.
The president is not entitled to very much deference in staffing the third branch of government, the judiciary.
Excuse me, but the Constitution itself confers that very deference upon the office of President of the United States.
The Post says:
Leave aside the merits of the Roberts nomination, which we support; if Mr. Reid regards Judge Roberts as unworthy, he is duty-bound to vote against him. But these are dangerous words that Democrats will come to regret.
Go read the rest.
Via Bench Memos
Powered by WordPress and WordPress Theme created with Artisteer by SC Themes.
We use cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using our site, you consent to cookies.
Websites store cookies to enhance functionality and personalise your experience. You can manage your preferences, but blocking some cookies may impact site performance and services.
Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the proper function of the website.
These cookies are needed for adding comments on this website.
Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us understand how visitors use our website.
Google Analytics is a powerful tool that tracks and analyzes website traffic for informed marketing decisions.
Service URL: policies.google.com
Marketing cookies are used to follow visitors to websites. The intention is to show ads that are relevant and engaging to the individual user.
Pinterest Tag is a web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.
Service URL: policy.pinterest.com
X Pixel enables businesses to track user interactions and optimize ad performance on the X platform effectively.
Service URL: x.com
A video-sharing platform for users to upload, view, and share videos across various genres and topics.
Service URL: www.youtube.com