Rich at The Capitol Fax Blog has a terrific round-up.
Last night’s episode of King of the Hill included a dig at the Grey Lady…
Ian caught it. Go see it. Laugh.
Found this at A Large Regular (thanks Chris, for making my Monday!)
Check out this post and the comments!
For each and every person that is, ever has been, and ever will be on this Earth.

Welcome PoliPundit readers! Happy Easter! Thanks Lorie.
related: He is risen
Freedom of speech is at stake here, don’t you all see? If anything, we should all make cartoons of Mohammed and show the terrorists and the extremists that we are all united in the belief that every person has a right to say what they want. Look people, it’s been really easy for us to stand up for free speech lately. For the past few decades, we haven’t had to risk anything to defend it. One of those times is right now. And if we aren’t willing to risk what we have now, then we just believe in free speech, but won’t defend it.
That was from Part I.
In Part II the image of Mohammed was censored out by [tag]Comedy Central[/tag] (Spruiell, NRO Media Blog)
In Part II, what was not censored was an “Al-Qaeda” video showing two “Americans”, President Bush, and Jesus pooping over each other and the American Flag.
That was okay in Comedy Central’s books – but an image of Mohammed handing a football helmet with a salmon on top to Peter from Family Guy was not.
Vaughn Ververs over at Public Eye has more.
The Anchoress says this
I thought the Al Qaeda “retaliation” cartoon was effectively dumb but meaningful. In a perfect world, terrorists and extremists would respond to offensive cartoons with offensive cartoons. The point was made to America by SP putting up a cartoon bound to offend various Americans – and any American who would rather not see “pooping” on the flag. Once again, they put the question out there – “what will you allow and what will you ban? And are you willing to fight for the First Amendment or just pay lip service to it until one of your sacred cows-or-icons are insulted?”
I agree with her.
As usual Michelle Malkin is all over it. She also has another post with new Comedy Central Logos. This is Allah Pundit’s submission. I agree with Michelle that it is indeed the frontrunner.

Welcome Betsy’s Page readers! Please have a look around. (home)
[tags]cartoon wars[/tags]
We listen to Queen in the car all the time so I TiVo’d Idol last night so we could watch the Idol Kids do Queen.
Bucky was okay with Fat Bottomed Girls, but as Simon said, the song was a little too big for him.
Ace doing We Will Rock You – I wasn’t really awed – I didn’t like the way he did it, but the little guy liked it.
Kellie did Bohemian Rhapsody truncating the song as they do really didn’t do it justice. The song is 5 minutes and 54 seconds long and they cut it down to like 140 seconds. She did okay though. She can belt.
Chris doing Innuendo. I wasn’t really familiar with this song, but he did a really good job. That voice is something else.
Katherine Who Wants to Live Forever she was good. I liked it.
Elliott does Somebody to Love – he said he’d never heard the song before. His voice didn’t seem right for this song. Anne Hathaway did it wonderfully in Ella Enchanted.
Taylor does Crazy Little Thing Love I think his register was a little high for me. Simon said he thought “it was ridiculous”.
Paris. Brian May said “She’s damn good.” The Show Must Go On. I’m impressed. She has a very good voice and she can really belt.
This was the first time I’ve watched Idol. I’ve heard a lot about it and my Mom watches all the time. I was interested because of the Queen songs. Of course, Freddy’s shoes are really big ones to fill, and very hard to fill as well. If I was voting it would have been for either Paris or Chris.
Ace of Trump points us to a story from the Chicago Chronicle. Sun Times story here.
The Chicago City council has passed an ordinance that turns a 1989 Daley executive order into law. The executive order says:
No agent or agency shall request information about or otherwise investigate or assist in the investigation of citizenship or residency status of any person unless such an inquiry or investigation is required by statute, ordinance, federal regulation or court decision.
The Sun Times adds,
It further orders that city services, benefits and opportunities should not be “conditioned” on “matters related to citizenship or residency status” unless otherwise required by law.
The ordinance passed Wednesday “would say, ‘Look, when we provide city services, be it by police or any other city agency, our focus is not immigration status,'” said Ricardo Meza, regional counsel for the Mexican-American Legal Defense and Education Fund, who testified in support of the law.
So the “sanctuary city” designation is now law, not just an executive order.
The last two paragraphs of the story read:
Ald. Billy Ocasio (26th), chairman of the City Council’s Human Relations Committee, noted that Wednesday’s vote could set the stage for a court challenge if the final federal law is close to the tough immigration bill sponsored by U.S. Rep. James Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.). He said Sensenbrenner wants to supersede home rule.
“It gives us leverage if they pass the Sensenbrenner bill. … We need to send a clear message that we are not going to do this,” Ocasio said.
I don’t know if this gives you any leverage Mr. Ocasio – If you refuse to comply the feds can take all your federal funding away from you. Chicago gets a lot of federal funding…