Bump to top.
After TWO days, not ten, the Click for Cathy Campaign has been completed!
Click again and again to help out Chris Muir’s sister Cathy.
See Day by Day for the particulars and click and click again.
When my Dad had cancer this was something that we looked into, but his cancer wouldn’t have responded to it. Sadly, he passed away almost three years ago, September 4th, 2002.
From Angry in the Great White North :
In response to questions regarding the Cindy Sheehan/Crawford Texas issue:
Sheehan Family Statement:
The Sheehan Family lost our beloved Casey in the Iraq War and we have been silently, respectfully grieving. We do not agree with the political motivations and publicity tactics of Cindy Sheehan. She now appears to be promoting her own personal agenda and notoriety at the the expense of her son’s good name and reputation. The rest of the Sheehan Family supports the troops, our country, and our President, silently, with prayer and respect.Sincerely,
Casey Sheehan’s grandparents, aunts, uncles and numerous cousins.
Angry in T.O. has checked the statement out and emailed one of the aunts for confirmation. Confirmation was received.
BobG at Sweet Spirits of Ammonia brings our attention to another lack of personal responsibility story and the lawyers who help them.
A couple in South Carolina were stopped by the police and given tickets for improper plates, driving on a suspended license and driving without insurance.
The driver, Tony Gainey, admits, “I shouldn’t been driving. I am guilty of that, but the stop never would have taken place if they wouldn’t have violated our rights”
Tony Gainey says his rights were violated because he believes that the police in Greer, SC stopped him because he has a some bumper stickers on his car. One bumper sticker reads: “It’s a Druid Thing.”
The ACLU has jumped on the bandwagon demanding that the charges against Gainey be dropped and that an apology be made to the Gaineys.
Religious persecution. Yep, that’s exactly what this is. And never mind that the charges are perfectly valid, since the tickets were apparently given based on that darn bumper sticker, they aren’t valid anymore…
But think about it, one of the charges is improper plates. Doesn’t it stand to reason that during a routine plate check, finding out that the plates were improper would give sufficient cause to stop the vehicle? But nooooo, the Gainey’s feel that the plates were checked because of one of many bumper stickers on their car said “It’s a Druid Thing”.
Remember to visit Stop the ACLU
The National Abortion Federation and the Feminist Majority Foundation haved joined with NARAL in their false accusations against John Roberts. Via Blogs for Bush, we find that FactCheck.org has posted NARAL Falsely Accuses Supreme Court Nominee Roberts. Reuter’s story Abortion-rights groups demand documents on Roberts states:
The groups, which largely oppose Roberts because of his intervention in the abortion clinic case, also said senators must press Roberts on the brief he co-authored that contended that harassment aimed at women seeking abortion services did not constitute discrimination.
This is covered in full at FactCheck.org in their rebuttal to the NARAL ad.
From FactCheck.org:
The brief that Roberts signed, and on which the NARAL ad is based, is from another matter entirely. It is dated April 11, 1991. Furthermore, it is from a civil lawsuit brought by abortion clinics against protesters who were blockading the clinics. Bombing was not an issue.
Supporting Anti-abortion Groups?
The ad contends that Roberts “filed court briefs supporting violent fringe groups and a convicted clinic bomber.” Indeed, Roberts’ name appears on the “friend of the court” brief in Bray v. Alexandria Women’s Health Clinic that the ad shows. But what Roberts was supporting wasn’t violence or bombing or even the behavior that was the subject of the lawsuit – blockades of clinics. In fact, Roberts went out of his way to say that the blockaders were trespassing, which is a violation of state law. What Roberts argued was that a federal anti-discrimination law couldn’t be used against abortion blockaders because they weren’t discriminating against women – they were blockading men, too.
These things are easy to check and we bloggers check them.
Welcome Blogs for Bush readers! Please look around.
Welcome Jack Lewis.net readers!
Via Michelle Malkin:
The New Haven Register reports that a People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) display “Are Animals the New Slaves” which was “showing” at the Green in New Haven, CT has caused much consternation.
The display, which is on a national tour, shows large photos of minorities being beaten, lynched or killed alongside photos of animals in “similar” circumstances.
One man demanded that the NAACP get involved immediately. Five minutes later, Scot X. Esdaile, president of the state and Greater New Haven chapters of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, arrived at the scene, surveyed the photos and blasted the organizers.
“Once again, black people are being pimped. You used us. You have used us enough,” Esdaile said. “Take it down immediately.”
“I am a black man! I can’t compare the suffering of these black human beings to the suffering of this cow,” said Michael Perkins, 47, of New Haven. He stood in front of a photo of butchered livestock hung next to the photo of two lynched black men dangling before a white mob.
“You can’t compare me to a freaking cow,” shouted John Darryl Thompson, 46, of New Haven, inches from Carr’s face. “We don’t care about PETA. You are playing a dangerous game.”
Paul Tomaselli, 46, of North Branford took exception to an exhibit that included a photo of a black man being beaten to the ground by a white man with a stick while a white mob gathers.
Next to that photo was one of a man chasing a seal across the snow with a club.
PETA is definitely in the wrong here.
Welcome Michelle Malkin Readers! (Thanks Betsy). Please look around.
Georgia Rally – O’Reilly/Williams
Over the weekend thousands of people showed up for a Jesse Jackson-sponsored event that brought attention to the Voting Rights Act and protested Georgia’s requiring a picture ID before allowing someone to vote. Talking Points admires the Voting Rights Act and wants the act extended forever – on this we agree with Jackson and his supporters. But Jackson and others are objecting to voters having to produce picture IDs in Georgia. This is an anti-fraud measure, and the state says it will actually come to your house and give you an ID if you don’t already have one. Sounds reasonable, but far left pundits such as Cynthia Tucker, editorial page boss of the Atlanta Constitution, say asking for IDs will disenfranchise some minorities. The truth is this – valid picture IDs will cut down on fraud. Elderly and sick people can easily acquire them, and the whole issue is a fraud. But it serves the purpose of ideologues like Jesse Jackson and Cynthia Tucker, and that’s what this is really all about.
Ian at the Political Teen has the video of the remarks made during the march.
Bill O’Reilly spoke with Juan Williams last night regarding the Voting Rights Rally in Georgia
O’Reilly: Joining us from Washington, Fox News Analyst Juan Williams. I had to slow down because we had all this fancy gadgetry and I wanted people to see you and not the graphic… Now look Juan, we disagree on a lot of things, respectfully always, you know you’re one of our favorite guests here. But you’ve gotta agree with me on this, this is simply bogus, this is nonsense and Belafonte and Mathis and Tucker should be ashamed of themselves.
Williams: Without a doubt. I was stunned at what you just played. I have such respect for especially Cynthia Tucker I just, I don’t know what’s going on there. This is clearly a case, where it seems to me, you have people reenacting things that happened forty years ago, but they’re reacting to devils that have been slain forty years ago. Nobody is saying that you shouldn’t have the voting right. In fact, the Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales, has said that he thinks he’s going to support the continuation/extension of the provisions 2 5 and 203 that expire in 2007. So what you have here is exactly what you just said, Bill, which is an opportunity for them to bash President Bush, to go after republicans, to make it out as if republicans don’t want black people to vote. This is, you know given what’s going on here with Ken Mehlman, the chairman of the Republican Party having extensive outreach to black voters, I think they’re out of step and out of date.
Continue reading
It is clear that there are two distinct perspectives on the “cause” of the recent U.K. bombings. The one view, thankfully one that appears to be held by most responsible leaders, is that this is part of the larger war that militant Islam has been waging against the West for over a decade now. The terrorists wage a war of terror because they wish to destroy our way of life and impose taliban style rule, at least throughout the Middle East, much of Asia, and perhaps now even Europe.
The other view, which most certainly will lead to defeat if adopted by our world leaders, is one premised on the terrorists really being victims of Western policies. They are merely responding to our transgressions. It’s really our fault. We should leave them alone and they won’t continue to attack. In the old days this policy used to be called appeasement – do as they wish, and hopefully they won’t take their radical agenda too far. We saw the results of this in the 1930’s. It’s easy to look back at the isolationists and pro-appeasement lobby of the 1930’s and label them as an ignorant minority, but then, as now, the tendancy towards appeasement is a powerful one, shared by many in society.
What exists today that we did not see in the 1930’s are the faux hawks that are really appeasers. Sheep in wolves’ clothing. They won’t come out and directly say that the U.S. is to blame. Instead they’ll proclaim outrage against the terrorists in one breath, while chastising the West’s policies in the next. They dance around directly justifying the terrorists actions because they know taking that position is repugnant, yet they take that position nonetheless, believing in the terrorists’ cause -make that their naive, ethnocentric interpretation of the terrorists’ cause.
Beware of the sheep in wolves’ clothing.
From the Susan M. Torres Fund site:
The Torres and Rollin families are proud to announce that Mrs. Susan Torres gave birth at 8:18 am on Tuesday, August 2, 2005 to Susan Anne Catherine Torres. The baby weighs 1 pound 13 ounces and measures 13 ½ inches long.
There were no complications during delivery. The baby is doing well and is being monitored in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of Virginia Hospital Center.
The Torres family will hold a press conference tomorrow, August 3, 2005, at 1:00 p.m. eastern time at Virginia Hospital Center. Further details will be available at that time.
Congratulations! Our prayers are with you.
UPDATE: This afternoon, the ventilator was turned off and Susan M. Torres is now with the Lord. To the Torres/Rollin families: Our prayers are with you all.
We’ve been very busy lately. I’ve been working full time as well as going to school full time and I know Jeff has been very busy too. We will post as we can. Thanks for hanging in there!
